data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a72c/8a72c99034e1774d88fd3473628b797a3d5d4e02" alt=""
about new media art:
Q After X years of blogging, what underlying picture do you now see in the scene? Phenomenons that amazed you?
A That it remains such a niche phenomenon. The traditional art scene seems to believe that the so-called “new media artists” are just playing some kind of geeky games. I wasn’t expecting my blog to sparkle so many interest from the technology world and be ignored by the “traditional” art sphere. I think it’s slowly changing. It took decades to accept photography as an art discipline so let’s be patient.
about humor:
Q To me, humor plays an important role in what you’re posting in WMMNA. How do you think this dimension can bring critical elements about technology usages?
A I think humour is very important. it helps getting the attention of the audience. humour puts the piece into a non-threatening, non-intimidating light. which helps a lot to get the message out.
Full interview here
related: Who make money not art ?
No comments:
Post a Comment